As we understand that, Leadership
is termed as an ability to influence others to achieve the desired goals and a
good leader is surrounded with several attributes including self-confidence,
high intelligence, integrity, sociability and conceptual skills. [Laureate
Education, Leadership in organizations - Video file].
Wednesday, December 20, 2017
Thursday, April 6, 2017
Saturday, April 1, 2017
Monday, March 27, 2017
Managing Risks in Projects
You would agree that risks are
inherent to all projects. However, if risks are identified early and managed throughout
the project, you may be able to minimize the impact of these risks on your
project’s success and outcomes.In this article we will examine the case of Margaret Jason. An experienced instructional designer who's faced with a task to literally rescue her team, following a recent client reaction.
Dilemmas facing Instructional Design Project Managers
There are several factors that can influence the decisions of a project manager that have little or nothing to do with the project itself. Examples of such factors include structure,culture, or even a political climate in an organization. This article looks at challenges that Justin, a newly appointed project manager faces at the General Sensor Company
Effective Communication in Instructional Design - The case of Beth Owens
Effective communication is a key aspect in any instructional design project. Effective communication between project members and stakeholders is essential for a successful project. As an instructional designer and a project manager, you may need to develop intervention strategies to address any communication issues or conflicts that may arise during the course of the project. Case study number 16 about Beth Owen's introduces Beth as a novice Instructional Designer who is to work with Chef Reiner the current program owner, who has strong beliefs in how the program is run.
Let us now look at the challenges that Beth Owens' faces as an Instructional Designer.
I see the main challenge as the
conflicting ideological theories between Chef Reiner and Berth, the
instructional designer. From the case study, it is very clear that Berth favors
the constructivist approach while Chef Reiner prefers more
traditional behaviorist approach e.g. in his statement ‘’Kitchens require a
distinct chain of authority and rules’’(Ertmer, Quinn, & Glzewski,
2014).
The other challenge is Berth is
a novice instructional designer. She has little experience in performing needs
analysis and hence her reliance on theoretical ways to apply her preferences. A
thorough analysis on needs, students’ opinions and evaluations would provide
her with information that she could use to advise
Chef Reiner regardless of her beliefs, in that way she will provide
solutions objectively. Being bias can be detrimental in making design
decisions. Another challenge would be in determining the approach to obtain data
(from needs, learner and context analysis) that will help Berth make objective
decisions.
As the Project Manager in this
case study, what specific actions should Dean Jacobs have taken to improve
the chef’s’s communication with stakeholders (students)?
It is critical to have everyone
on board. There are many people who play a role in a project success, such
as drivers and supporters. In this case, the Chef is among the drivers and the
students are among key stakeholders. I would suggest that Dean Jacobs organize
a meeting with the Chef and Beth to:
Make the purpose of the project
clear, the roles of every member, his critical role (ensuring that he knows he
is playing a critical role) and deliverables. As each is being taken through
the deliverables, it should be made clear that the stakeholders’ needs must be
addressed. I would recommend that all stakeholders are identified, their
expectations and concerns made clear and then together work on how the
expectations and concerns are met or addressed. The students’ feedback must be
shared respectfully and candidly while assuring the Chef that the projects’
planned results still address the needs of having a quality program in place. I
recommend that such feedback be given individually and then formally documented.
A specific plan to involve stakeholders throughout the project could be useful
where a small group of graduates and existing students take part in a focus
group during the project to provide input and insights.
As the Instructional Designer,
what should Beth have done differently to ensure that the final training
product that was produced truly met the needs of all of the stakeholders
(students)?
In depth analysis is key.
Understanding the existing program and its challenges, feedback from learners
and having an understanding of what is actually being solved or addressed could
help Beth enormously.
Avoiding biasness and being
open minded. Designing and developing a program while you have already decided
on the method to be used can be tricky. It does not give you an opportunity to
listen and view the situation in a holistic way.
Understand her role and that of
others within the team such as the Chef. While the chef is experienced in
delivering the program and seem intimidating, Beth should have confidence,
demonstrate her expertise knowledge to provide support, options and
constructive feedback. She should also be able to communicate well. In this
case I would say communication should be formal based on communication plan.
Reference
Ertmer, P., Quinn, J. (Eds.) & Glazewski,
K. (2014). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design (4th ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Portny, S. E., Kramer, B. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., &
Shafer, S. M. (2007). Project management. Chichester,
United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
How to engage stakeholders in instructional design projects
Introduction
In an ID project, there are
different kinds of stakeholders. A project manager must have the ability to
manage and deal with different people (Murphy, 1994).
When referring to my team, I
always compare a project team to a band. An instructional design project cannot
be implemented successfully without the whole band being fully engaged. Well
informed, engaged stakeholders can provide the project with insights, views,
share guidance and opinions that are vital to the instructional design project.
A critical part of the engagement is having them understand what the project is
all about, the benefits, their roles, how they can support the project and how
the project would support them.
At my workplace the key
stakeholders are the members of the executive team that includes the chief of
Human Resources (the budget owner), respective Chiefs who requests for specific
programs to be developed for the business and staff development, the banks
staff, my line manager, marketing and communication team, senior managers,
subject matter experts, IT team and the other two learning and development
managers ( virtual learning is a key driver to deliver training programs, a
virtual learning manager hence works as a link between the other two learning
and development manager) . All these stakeholders have interest in the outcomes
of the Instructional Design projects. It is important to identify your
stakeholders and obtain their buy in early on in the project to ensure success
of an ID project. TechRepublic (http://www.techrepublic.com/) shares a simple form that
identifies the stakeholders, their roles in the project, importance and impact
etc.
Source http://www.techrepublic.com/
Three examples of the types of
people in an organization who could cause re-work or otherwise negatively
impact an ID project.
Responding to this question is
like attending a therapy session of a situation I am currently in. Before I
start lamenting on the situation, it’s important to know that just because
someone disagrees with us, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are difficult. That
being cleared, I must say, some people thrive on being difficult and find every
way to demonstrate their competence in the field e.g. differing opinions
to the extent that no one can move ahead, disengaged SME who chooses not to
respond to emails, never send contents and documents on time (or submit wrong
versions) and try to avoid you at the canteen, the bossy ones who wants you to
change a memo to an e-learning course ---the list is ongoing (welcome to my
world).
Allow
me to share three personalities that in my view can cause re-work.
Personality
|
Features
|
Strategies on how to deal with them
|
When to engage during the project process
|
Sherman tanks
|
·
The want everybody to agree with their view point, they
literally get angry, can be abusive, attacking, intimidating and
confrontational when you disagree with them. They often cause the project not
to proceed especially if they are the sponsors.
|
·
Give them an opportunity to air their thoughts.
·
Communicate your views, plans and targets in a
non-confrontational manner
·
Explain consequences of continuing e.g. disagreeing
·
Escalate to get more assistance and inform that you will be
seeking assistance.
|
Initial phase of the project
|
Know-it-all-experts
|
These are in their own
league. They are very productive, they share details, facts and knowledge.
They are accurate and good planners ---and that’s when things get tough: -
they believe their input should suffice, they can hardly wait for others
thoughts and often make decisions that could hurt the entire project.
E.g. Can we add this item to the project, and another item?
Introducing budget, time and resources issues.
|
I usually node and show that I am listening to them. I try to
avoid confrontations at any time. I acknowledge their experience and
expertise while asking for more details (letting them be the experts) and
communicate what exactly I want/need.
|
Implementation and initial stage
|
Indecisive
|
They can’t just make decisions, they delay things because they
do not want to upset or hurt other people. Sometimes these people are
perfectionists and want to have high standards regardless of the timelines
etc.
|
Provide information, clarity, structure, engagement at every
little step to help them make an informed decision. Share policies and
procedures to reassure decisions are aligned. I also bank on my ability to
develop trust and good work relationships so they get comfortable in making
decisions.
|
Initial stage
|
What I have seen working best
is having the emotional intelligence to deal with different personality types,
listening, understanding and collaboration – i.e. ‘’seek first to understand
then to be understood’’ – Stephen Covey’s habits of highly effectively people
as mentioned in the project management minimalist (pg. 48)
Reference
Murphy, C. (1994). Utilizing project management techniques in the design of
instructional materials. Performance & Instruction, 33(3), 9–11.
Laureate Education, Inc.
(Executive Producer). (n.d.). Project management concerns: ‘Scope creep’ [Video
file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Elliott, L. (2007, June 08).
Use these two forms to analyze your stakeholders - Page 1027920. Retrieved
January 18, 2017, fromhttp://www.techrepublic.com/article/use-these-two-forms-to-analyze-your-stakeholders/1027920/
Portny, S. E., Kramer, B. E.,
Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., & Shafer, S. M. (2007). Project management.
Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)